In one of the client organizations, the team has kept two months' inventory worth of say 20 Lakhs to service the customer as directed. The client organization is supplying to one of the reputed, large scale engineering organization. The monthly avg billing is around 10 Lakhs, and the customer insisted the client keep a minimum of 2 months FG stock at any point in time. The customer made it as one of the key performance metrics for the client organization and advised to keep the customer updated on the FG inventory status periodically.
As I diagnosed with the organization, their overall average delivery schedule actualization to the all the customers around 60 % only, and the manufacturing plan is usually based on the urgency or followup by the customers daily.
We worked with the organization and identified the constraints in the casting process, and their OEE was also low as 25 %. Eventually, within nine months, their OEE started rising to 60 %, and the business head is also working on machine maintenance improvements, technology up-gradation, daily planning based on capacity rather than urgency, and so on.
The above said customer 's order was being fulfilled at a 100 % rate every month, and the organization's business head felt that there was no need for keeping two months FG stock as the production capacity increased to deliver the order commitment every month. So, they reduced the inventory to the safety level of 15 days, and the customers' also getting the KPI dashboard periodically as usual.
Things were moving smoothly. During one of the conversations between the customer's representative and the business head, the customer said that they were not particularly interested in insisting on minimum FG stock. Since their history of delivery commitment was not so good, for safer side, they asked on maintaining minimum stock. They were ok with the reduction in inventory norm as long as delivering on time.
The moral of the incident :
The customer is not interested or does not want to penalize the supplier for insisting on keeping a minimum level of inventory in the name of vendor managed inventory or warehouse stock etc. as long as the supplier has the capability and flexibility to serve them. Keeping inventory is only to protect the variation in demand or supply, not to penalize the supplier.
It is up to the small organization to be smart in the manufacturing process, capacity, and planning to avoid or reduce the inventory and prevent the customer from imposing any rule on keeping inventory!
As I diagnosed with the organization, their overall average delivery schedule actualization to the all the customers around 60 % only, and the manufacturing plan is usually based on the urgency or followup by the customers daily.
We worked with the organization and identified the constraints in the casting process, and their OEE was also low as 25 %. Eventually, within nine months, their OEE started rising to 60 %, and the business head is also working on machine maintenance improvements, technology up-gradation, daily planning based on capacity rather than urgency, and so on.
The above said customer 's order was being fulfilled at a 100 % rate every month, and the organization's business head felt that there was no need for keeping two months FG stock as the production capacity increased to deliver the order commitment every month. So, they reduced the inventory to the safety level of 15 days, and the customers' also getting the KPI dashboard periodically as usual.
Things were moving smoothly. During one of the conversations between the customer's representative and the business head, the customer said that they were not particularly interested in insisting on minimum FG stock. Since their history of delivery commitment was not so good, for safer side, they asked on maintaining minimum stock. They were ok with the reduction in inventory norm as long as delivering on time.
The moral of the incident :
The customer is not interested or does not want to penalize the supplier for insisting on keeping a minimum level of inventory in the name of vendor managed inventory or warehouse stock etc. as long as the supplier has the capability and flexibility to serve them. Keeping inventory is only to protect the variation in demand or supply, not to penalize the supplier.
It is up to the small organization to be smart in the manufacturing process, capacity, and planning to avoid or reduce the inventory and prevent the customer from imposing any rule on keeping inventory!
No comments:
Post a Comment